Agnieszka Kleszcz

(Angielski) PDF


Multiple studies have shown that Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has boosted the growth of the global economy and improved the quality of life. At present, a significant proportion of innovations and new patents are held by companies operating in the ICT sector.
This study has two primary aims. The first of them is an analytical comparison of industrial investments in research and development (R&D) in ICT-related companies in various countries from the European Union. The second is to examine the relationship between these investments and each country’s digital performance illustrated by the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). The main contribution of this paper is a proposal of a means to determining the quantitative relationship between R&D and DESI as well as the identification of the most important DESI component. The author focuses on the largest R&D investors from a list of 1,000 companies, created on the basis of data published by the Economics of Industrial Research and Innovation (IRI), covering the years 2013–2019. Both variables (DESI and R&D) have a clear joint group structure found by Ward’s hierarchical clustering. Furthermore, an exponential law was identified predicting an increase of 18% in R&D expenditure when a 1 percentage point growth in DESI is observed. Among all the components of DESI, the applied random forest model proves human capital is the most important factor attracting R&D investments.
Moreover, a separate analysis of R&D relating to the analysed companies showed a growing trend in R&D investments with its predicted value reaching over 46 billion euro in 2021.


ICT sector, industrial R&D investment, Digital Economy and Society Index, innovation


O30, C10


Bouguettaya, A., Yu, Q., Liu, X., Song, A. (2015). Efficient agglomerative hierarchical clustering. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(5), 2785–2797. .

Bozkurt, C. (2015). R&D Expenditures and Economic Growth Relationship in Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(1), 188–198. .

Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. .

Daiko, T., Dernis, H., Dosso, M., Gkotsis, P., Squicciarini, M., Vezzani, A. (2017). World Corporate Top R&D Investors: Industrial Property Strategies in the Digital Economy. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. .

De Prato, G., Nepelski, D. (2013). The global R&D network: A network analysis of international R&D centres. (JRC Technical Reports). .

Dillon, J., Langmore, I., Tran, D., Brevdo, E., Vasudevan, S., Moore, D., Patton, B., Alemi, A., Hoffman, M., Saurous, R. (2017). Tensor Flow Distributions. .

Doong, S. H., Ho, S.-C. (2012). The impact of ICT development on the global digital divide. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(5), 518–533. .

Durbin, J., Koopman, S. J. (2012). Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Edquist, H., Henrekson, M. (2017). Swedish lessons: How important are ICT and R&D to economic growth? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 42, 1–12. .

EPID. (2015). Knowledge based economy. .

EPO. (2020). Digital technologies take top spot in European patent applications. .

EU. (2018). EU R&D Scoreboard. The 2018 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. .

EU. (2019). EU R&D Scoreboard. The 2019 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. .

European Commission. (2012). Internationalisation of business investments in R&D. .

European Commission. (2018a). DESI 2018 Digital Economy and Society Index. Methodological note. .

European Commission. (2018b). Indeks gospodarki cyfrowej i społeczeństwa cyfrowego (DESI) 2018. Sprawozdanie krajowe dotyczące Polski. .

European Commission. (2019). The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). .

European Commission. (2020a). Digital Economy and Society Index. .

European Commission. (2020b). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). Methodological note. .

European Commission. (2020c). EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard 2019 (EU 1000). .

Eurostat. (2018). Digital economy and society statistics – enterprises. .

Eurostat. (2019). ICT specialists in employment. .

FTSE. (2012). International Classification Benchmark. .

Gareth, J., Witten, D., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. (2017). An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R. Springer. .

GUS. (2017). Społeczeństwo informacyjne w Polsce. Wyniki badań statystycznych z lat 2013–2017. Information society in Poland. Results of statistical surveys in the years 2013–2017. .

Hernández, H., Grassano, N., Tübke, A., Potters, L., Gkotsis, P., Vezzani, A. (2016). EU R&D Scoreboard. The 2015 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. .

Hernández, H., Grassano, N., Tübke, A., Potters, L., Gkotsis, P., Vezzani, A. (2018). The 2018 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. .

Hernández, H., Grassano, N., Tübke, A., Amoroso, S., Csefalvay, Z., Gkotsis, P. (2019). The 2019 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. .

Hilmersson, F. P., Hilmersson, M. (2020). Networking to accelerate the pace of SME innovations. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. .

Hong, J. (2017). Causal relationship between ICT R&D investment and economic growth in Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 70–75. .

Investin. (2017). Growth perspectives for Polish ICT sector by 2025. .

Jin, S., Cho, C. M. (2015). Is ICT a new essential for national economic growth in an information society? Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 253–260. .

Jorgenson, D. W., Vu, K. M. (2016). The ICT revolution, world economic growth, and policy issues. Telecommunications Policy, 40(5), 383–397. .

Kisielnicki, J. (2016). Innowacyjność gospodarki polskiej na tle wybranych krajów Unii Europejskiej i świata. Studia Ekonomiczne, (281), 67–79. .

Liu, C. (2017). International Competitiveness and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(4), 111–133. .

Nepelski, D., De Prato, G. (2012). Internationalisation of ICT R&D: a comparative analysis of Asia, the European Union, Japan, United States and the rest of the world. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 20(2), 219–238. .

OECD. (2004). OECD Information Technology Outlook. .

OECD., Eurostat. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data.

OECD Publishing. .

Palczewska, A., Palczewski, J., Robinson, R. M., Neagu, D. (14–16.08.2013). Interpreting random forest classification models using a feature contribution method. IEEE 14th International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration, San Francisco.

Pesole, A. (2015). How much does ICT contribute to innovation output? An analysis of the ICT component in the innovation output indicator. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. .

Pradhan, R. P., Mallik, G., Bagchi, T. P. (2018). Information communication technology (ICT) infrastructure and economic growth: A causality evinced by cross-country panel data. IIMB Management Review, 30(1), 91–103. .

Schwab, K. (Ed.). (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. World Economic Forum.–2018.pdf .

Sepehrdoust, H. (2018). Impact of information and communication technology and financial development on economic growth of OPEC developing economies. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 40(1). .

Sylwestrzak, M. (2018). Wpływ ICT na wzrost gospodarczy w krajach Unii Europejskiej w latach 2006–2016 (Impact of ICT on economic growth in the European Union in the years 2006– 2016), Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług, 1(131), 361–369. .

Vu, K. M. (2013). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Singapore’s economic growth. Information Economics and Policy, 25(4), 284–300. .

Żelazny, R. (2015). Determinanty rozwoju społeczeństwa informacyjnego – implikacje dla rozwoju gospodarczego. Studia Ekonomiczne, (213), 45–58. .

Do góry
© 2019-2022 Copyright by Główny Urząd Statystyczny, pewne prawa zastrzeżone. Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa - Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0) Creative Commons — Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International — CC BY-SA 4.0